Here’s a great article on course evaluations, from University Affairs: Course evaluations: the good, the bad and the ugly.
Now, here are selected comments from students. As always, sarcasm filters are off. Beware!
From PSYCO 104:
- focus on textbook is unhelpful, your [sic] the teacher to teach the students we shouldn’t have to teach the majority of the class to ourselves(So in a university-level course, you don’t want a textbook. Seriously? Is that how all your other courses are run?)
Heavy reliance on both textbook/notes is hard to cope with, please pick one
It would be a lot easier if we got our tests back or if they were posted online.(Because some of the exam questions are copyright, I am not allowed to release them. You do know that you can have a look at your exam during the exam viewings, or during the TA’s office hours, right? You do have to make the extra effort of schlepping all the way to the BioSci Building, however.)
I LOVE THIS PROF(Thanks. But STOP SHOUTING.)
Loepelmann, you got some mod swag brah(Thanks...I think.)
I took this course because my friend told me Dr. Loepelmann was a great prof and I am so glad I did. I thoroughly enjoyed this class and found it way more interesting than I expected! Really enjoyed the teaching style. Great class!(Thanks. Thanks. Thanks--but don’t call me professor).
He is a really nice prof and treat his students with respect. He cares for our welling (When I e-mailed his about my sickness he was very understandable and asked me how I was doing)
I believe that he is one of the most engaging and helpful professors at this University and we (students) are very lucky to have him.
- felt as though class was absolutely unnecessary to attend, felt like a waste of time. Class time was not efficiently used at all...exams were essentially straight from the textbook and did not include class notes...(That is not true. The exams include a substantial number of questions from lectures.)
- I don’t appreciate your explanations and teaching method(Sorry about the negative experience you had.)
- notes are vague
- I hate psychology, changing my program
- textbook is crazy [sic], I don’t get how much we need to know
I enjoyed the use of iClickers to help engage students in an interactive, group oriented manner.(Glad to hear about the positive experience you had.)
Taking part in the research participation studies is an enjoyable part of the course.
- Fantastic course!(No, I won’t curve it.)
One of the best courses/instructors at the U of A
However, please curve it.
I feel as if you [sic] questions are too wordy, like you are trying to trick students not test their knowledge. I also do not like fill in the blanks because if you miss day there is no way to fill them in.(What do you do in your other classes if you miss a day? Can’t you ask someone else in class if you can borrow their notes? You do know that I will send you the fill-in words if no one else will help you, right?)
The Instructor was good and tried to explain concepts clearly. He made the course fun and I enjoyed his sense of humour. I thought the fill-in-the-blank notes were very good and provided an incentive to come to class.(Hey, you should have shared your notes with the other person above.)
For a first year course that isn’t curved...too much mindrape(OK, I’ll cut down on some of the mindrape. Thanks for the feedback.)
From PSYCO 365: Advanced Perception:
Of my 5 years of post secondary, & both 267 & 365 w/ Loepelmann, he was by far my favorite professor. With a desire & passion for what he does, he is on another level from any other UofA prof I have had.(Gee, thanks!)
It would be nice to get better lectures [sic] slides.(I keep telling my Mom to update them, but she wants way too much money.)
There is a lot of info in the notes so studying was a bit overwhelming but it was nice having readings & quizzes, though it made me stressed out every Thursday morning! Great instructor, makes learning very interesting, & the course was probably the most interesting one I’ve taken so far!(Glad you liked it. Thanks for the feedback on the quizzes.)
Karsten is awesome and probably the best prof I have ever had in my 4 years at this university. However this was the hardest class I’ve ever taken and it destroyed my GPA and any chance of getting into grad school.(Gulp--sorry about that. If you’re struggling with the material, please come and see me for help. I’m not trying to destroy anyone’s GPA, or their future.)
- If the midterm is “historically difficult,” why not make it less difficult, or even break it up into 2 midterm?(With 130 students, 2 midterms would kill me--and the TA. The nature of the material is challenging; oversimplifying it or the midterm would not do it justice. Thanks for the feedback on the quizzes.)
- The weekly quizzes, despite the extra workload, were a huge help.
- 2nd half of course was much more interesting than 1st half.(Thanks. I’ll try to work on making the first half of the course more interesting.)
- Dr. Loepelmann is one of the most prepared + organized instructors I had ever had. He is enthusiastic, cheerful and his sense of humor is always welcome.
Loepelmann is an absolutely fantastic professor who is enthusiastic and knowledgable [sic] about the course material which is appreciated. Thank you for making this an enjoyable class.(Thanks, but don’t call me professor.)
Dr. Loepelmann is a very enthusiastic, intelligent, passionate and creative professor. I have had him for several psychology classes now, and his teaching style is very consistent and effective.
From PSYCO 494: Human Factors & Ergonomics:
Loved this class! :) I’m actually thinking of incorporating human factors into my future career!(Aw, gee, thanks a lot! But don’t call me professor.)
Dr Loepelmann is an amazing professor. I thoroughly enjoyed this course--the subject matter was fascinating and I know that what I’ve gained in the class can be used in my future endeavours. I would refer both this class and the instructor anyday. Thank you Dr Loepelmann.
Professor Loepelmann was such a wonderful professor! He was always excited about topics and watned for us to understand fully the course content. He was very accessible and helpful outside of class. I really hope I can take another course with him. I enjoyed this class very much, would highly recommend this professor to everyone!
I was disappointed with this class. I wish we didn’t have to know some of the discrete information like association names & numbers. It didn’t contribute to my learning in this course. Why couldn’t the Grant Mac assignment be at a different location? I expected better from this course especially since Dr. Loepelmann’s psych 104 class is why I majored in psychology (science) and this will be my last undergraduate psychology course.Why aren’t you studying?
Dr. Loepelmann on the other hand, thank you! You are a prof I will remember. I will continue to visit your blog--please update it more often, why aren’t you studying? :)